The arguments both for and against viewing the child's initial one-word utterances as HOLOPHRASES are reviewed. Some theoretical problems – concerning the innateness of language, the acquisition of syntax, the status of prosody and the child's comprehension of language during the one-word stage – with the holophrase controversy are pointed out. We suggest that an unresolvable theoretical stalemate exists because proponents on both sides of the controversy mistakenly assume the centrality of the notion sentence in discussing holophrases. An alternative view of early language development, which takes the SPEECH ACT as the basic unit of linguistic communication, is offered as a solution to the problems with the holophrase controversy as it now stands. We propose a more integrated description of the relations between functional and grammatical aspects of early communicative competence than is currently provided by sentence-oriented theories. In particular, we suggest that the child's PRAGMATIC INTENTIONS gradually become GRAMMATICALIZED as semantic and syntactic structures. Finally, three entities – communicative functions, referring expressions and predicating expressions – are proposed as LANGUAGE UNIVERSALS, as distinct from grammatical universals.
Type Articles Information Journal of Child Language , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , April 1975 , pp. 21 - 40 Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Bever , T. G. , Fodor , J. A. & Weksel , W. ( 1965 ). On the acquisition of syntax: a critique of ‘contextual generalization’ . PsychRev 72 . 467 –82.Google ScholarPubMed
Bloom , L. ( 1973 ). One word at a time: the use of single word utterances before syntax . The Hague : Mouton .Google Scholar
Braine , M. D. S. ( 1962 ). On learning the grammatical order of words . PsychRev 70 . 323 –48.Google Scholar